Episode
The Amazon PPC Search Term Impression Share Blind Spot
- Published
- Jun 18, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 529
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/performance-marketing-with-fexingo-paid-ads-roas-and-direct-response-conversations-7871641/episodes/the-amazon-ppc-search-term-impression-share-blind-spot/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/performance-marketing-with-fexingo-paid-ads-roas-and-direct-response-conversations-7871641/the-amazon-ppc-search-term-impression-share-blind-spot.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Episode 59 of Performance Marketing with Fexingo uncovers a hidden ROAS killer: your Amazon PPC search term impression share. Lucas and Luna explain why high-volume branded terms often have low impression share when bid too low, and how non-branded head terms can waste budget with high impression share but bad conversion rates. They walk through a real scenario—a supplements brand spending $15,000/month on branded terms with only 40% impression share—and show how reallocating bids to capture the missing 60% lifted ROAS by 22% in two weeks. The hosts also reveal why the search term impression share report in the Amazon Ads console is underused, and give a simple three-step audit to implement today. If you have ever wondered why your exact-match bids seem to deliver inconsistent results, this episode gives you the metric that explains it. #PerformanceMarketing #AmazonPPC #SearchTermImpressionShare #ROAS #PaidAds #AmazonAdvertising #PPCBidding #Ecommerce #DigitalMarketing #AmazonSeller #BrandedTerms #NonBrandedTerms #AdSpendOptimization #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #MarketingStrategy #AmazonPPCMistakes #ImpressionShare Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo