Episode
Tim Cruz Chose THESE Words After Lindsay Clancy’s Mistrial
- Published
- Sep 14, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 1958
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://audioboom.com/posts/8951840
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/hidden-killers-live-daily-true-crime-news-breakdowns-5650841/episodes/tim-cruz-chose-these-words-after-lindsay-clancy-s-mistrial/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/hidden-killers-live-daily-true-crime-news-breakdowns-5650841/tim-cruz-chose-these-words-after-lindsay-clancy-s-mistrial.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
The Lindsay Clancy jury could not reach a verdict, but Kevin Reddington says the split was 11-1 for acquittal. Minutes after the mistrial, Plymouth County DA Tim Cruz defended the case and described the deaths as the “cruel and calculated killing of three innocents.” That contrast is where the next fight begins. Judge William Sullivan ended the trial September 4 after more than 38 hours of deliberation over seven days. The defense argued Clancy was experiencing postpartum psychosis and was not criminally responsible. The Commonwealth argued the evidence showed planning, awareness, and control. Cruz said the evidence suggested to his office that Clancy remained in control of her actions. Eric Faddis, a defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins Tony Brueski to examine the choices available after a mistrial like this. Prosecutors can retry the same theory, adjust the way the case is presented, reconsider charges, explore a plea, or decide another trial will not produce a better result. Faddis also looks at how much weight an office should give a reported 11-1 split when jurors never returned a unanimous verdict. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins the conversation from a different direction. She looks at why the Clancy case has become so personal for viewers and why postpartum psychosis is being argued as a moral identity question instead of only a medical and legal issue. Her focus is on what that atmosphere communicates to parents who may already be frightened by their own thoughts and symptoms. Patrick Clancy’s lawyer has described another trial as extraordinarily painful for Patrick and his family. Cruz has not announced a retrial decision. With a September 29 court date scheduled, the prosecution has to decide what justice looks like after a jury reportedly came…