Episode
SoS 2026: Geofencing, Monsanto, and Haircuts
- Podcast
- Civil Discourse
- Published
- Jul 17, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 4204
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://share.transistor.fm/s/5b751d46
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/civil-discourse-765918/episodes/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/civil-discourse-765918/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Aughie and Nia finish this year's big Supreme Court rulings with three cases: Chatrie v United States, Monsanto Company v Durnell, and Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety. Chatrie centered on the use of geofencing warrants under the 4th Amendment. Monsanto argued that only the EPA could label its products cancer-causing, which the EPA has declined to do. Landor centered on immunity of guards to be individually sued for violating a prisoner's religious rights.