Episode

SoS 2026: Geofencing, Monsanto, and Haircuts

Podcast
Civil Discourse
Published
Jul 17, 2026
Duration seconds
4204
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://share.transistor.fm/s/5b751d46
Audio
https://media.transistor.fm/5b751d46/e95f29da.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/civil-discourse-765918/episodes/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts
Markdown
/podcast/civil-discourse-765918/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/civil-discourse-765918/episodes/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/civil-discourse-765918/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Aughie and Nia finish this year's big Supreme Court rulings with three cases: Chatrie v United States, Monsanto Company v Durnell, and Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety. Chatrie centered on the use of geofencing warrants under the 4th Amendment. Monsanto argued that only the EPA could label its products cancer-causing, which the EPA has declined to do. Landor centered on immunity of guards to be individually sued for violating a prisoner's religious rights.