# SoS 2026: Geofencing, Monsanto, and Haircuts

Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/civil-discourse-765918/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts
Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/civil-discourse-765918/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts.md
Podcast: [Civil Discourse](https://stenobird.com/podcast/civil-discourse-765918)
Published: 2026-07-17T16:00:00+00:00
Episode link: https://share.transistor.fm/s/5b751d46
Audio file: https://media.transistor.fm/5b751d46/e95f29da.mp3
Processing state: not_requested
JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/civil-discourse-765918/episodes/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts
Duration seconds: 4204

## Resource

Aughie and Nia finish this year's big Supreme Court rulings with three cases: Chatrie v United States, Monsanto Company v Durnell, and Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety. Chatrie centered on the use of geofencing warrants under the 4th Amendment. Monsanto argued that only the EPA could label its products cancer-causing, which the EPA has declined to do. Landor centered on immunity of guards to be individually sued for violating a prisoner's religious rights.

## Actions

- request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/civil-discourse-765918/episodes/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
- read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/civil-discourse-765918/sos-2026-geofencing-monsanto-and-haircuts.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed.

## Transcript

Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.