Episode
214. Too Buddhist, Not Self-Hating Enough: Counseling Whistleblower Suzannah Alexander
- Published
- May 18, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 6486
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://share.transistor.fm/s/c6979a24
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/you-must-be-some-kind-of-therapist-5142473/episodes/214-too-buddhist-not-self-hating-enough-counseling-whistleblower-suzannah-alexander/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/you-must-be-some-kind-of-therapist-5142473/214-too-buddhist-not-self-hating-enough-counseling-whistleblower-suzannah-alexander.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In this episode, I sit down with Suzannah Alexander — counseling-education whistleblower, writer of the Substack Diogenes in Exile , and now organizer with the National Association of Scholars. Suzannah enrolled in a Tennessee counseling master's program after 25 years as a stay-at-home parent, only to discover that what was being taught wasn't psychology at all. It was demographics, identity politics, and what she eventually came to call a totalitarian philosophy dressed up as "multicultural competency." We unpack the moment that broke her trust in the program: when she described the Buddhist practice of the non-self — focusing less on your own identity so you can extend loving kindness toward an aggressive client — three separate professors told her, within 48 hours, that this was "invalidating to other identities." She was ultimately deemed unsafe for practicum because she hadn't sufficiently absorbed the program's values around whiteness, privilege, and cultural deference. From there, the conversation widens into the structural picture. Suzannah walks us through CACREP, the accrediting body that's been quietly building a near-monopoly on counseling education, the ACA Code of Ethics that's now baked into most state licensure boards, and the consortium of organizations that decided — without testing whether any of it produces better clinical outcomes — that critical social justice ideology would be the "professional identity" of American counseling. We talk about why this matters for patients, what it does to the people who would have been excellent therapists, how we might build alternative training pathways and apprenticeship models outside the current system, and why the problems of the 21st century — including AI psychosis — will demand the kind of pioneering, fr…