Episode

126: What The Instrument Tells You About The Music

Podcast
WTF Bach
Published
Mar 10, 2026
Duration seconds
3531
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://wtfbach.substack.com/p/ep-126-what-the-instrument-tells
Audio
https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/190489069/6b6723efa2b74d854581f9ab34048dd0.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/wtf-bach-1217892/episodes/126-what-the-instrument-tells-you-about-the-music
Markdown
/podcast/wtf-bach-1217892/126-what-the-instrument-tells-you-about-the-music.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/wtf-bach-1217892/episodes/126-what-the-instrument-tells-you-about-the-music/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/wtf-bach-1217892/126-what-the-instrument-tells-you-about-the-music.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Analysis starts at 17 minutes. Sorry, I got carried away talking about the possible peculiar paradox of being a pianist. Just before making this episode, my harpsichord forced upon me a change of interpretation, so I started thinking about how and why this happens. I spoke about the way classical musicians are ‘bred,’ asking the following questions: How can we spend our lives playing music from the 18th century without any contact with the instruments used then? Can we know objective aspects of older music while playing on a single model of an instrument developed toward the end of the 19th century? Do pianists exist in a vacuum, where a musical interpretation is guided by a sort of subjective vision— is it even vanity or self-flattery? Certainly there are pianists who know the Steinway’s predecessors, but on the whole, I feel there is a real ignorance of the instruments on which our repertoire is founded. Perhaps, though, we are in the midst of a revolution of touch and interpretation: I’ve recently seen more pianists playing fortepianos, owning clavichords, et al. This can only lead to a more text-based reading of the music. But— mind you!— is that a good thing? Do we want to push the art of keyboard playing in a direction away from self expression and toward people claiming the ‘truth’ is on their side? That sounds awful! Even if pianism indeed exists a vacuum, it certainly produces rare visions of the music only accessible through such an art. Enough musing. While playing the A-flat major Prelude BWV 862 on my double manual harpsichord, the instrument, in a word, told me about the music. There was something about the limited palette of the instrument that forced upon me a new approach. This sort of radical adjustment to one’s playing is typical of playing on histor…