Episode

When the SEC Takes a Decade to Decide

Podcast
Unwritten Law
Published
Apr 27, 2026
Duration seconds
1337
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://unwritten-law.captivate.fm/episode/when-the-sec-takes-a-decade-to-decide
Audio
https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/5e63ec30-b59e-4911-b2f3-ea4573de1c7e.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/unwritten-law-7233280/episodes/when-the-sec-takes-a-decade-to-decide
Markdown
/podcast/unwritten-law-7233280/when-the-sec-takes-a-decade-to-decide.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/unwritten-law-7233280/episodes/when-the-sec-takes-a-decade-to-decide/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/unwritten-law-7233280/when-the-sec-takes-a-decade-to-decide.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

In this episode of Unwritten Law , NCLA President and Chief Legal Officer Mark Chenoweth and Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione are joined by Senior Litigation Counsel Russ Ryan to discuss Lek Securities Corp. v. SEC , a case highlighting extreme delays in administrative adjudication. The case involves a nearly decade-long delay by the SEC in resolving an appeal from a New York Stock Exchange disciplinary action—raising serious constitutional and statutory concerns. Russ explains how the delay implicates due process , the Administrative Procedure Act’s requirement that agencies act within a reasonable time, and even the SEC’s own internal deadlines. The conversation explores why such delays matter: individuals and firms can be effectively punished long before a final decision is issued, facing reputational harm, business disruption, and prolonged uncertainty. Mark, John, and Russ also discuss potential remedies, including whether courts should set aside agency actions when delays become egregious. The episode highlights broader structural concerns about administrative adjudication, including lack of accountability, limited access to judicial review, and incentives that allow agencies to delay decisions without consequence.