Episode

The Massachusetts Phone Spyware Case

Podcast
Unwritten Law
Published
Apr 4, 2026
Duration seconds
1082
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://unwritten-law.captivate.fm/episode/the-massachusetts-phone-spyware-case
Audio
https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/798f3681-2e05-4c8f-9f6f-990646f69a82.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/unwritten-law-7233280/episodes/the-massachusetts-phone-spyware-case
Markdown
/podcast/unwritten-law-7233280/the-massachusetts-phone-spyware-case.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/unwritten-law-7233280/episodes/the-massachusetts-phone-spyware-case/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/unwritten-law-7233280/the-massachusetts-phone-spyware-case.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Did the government install tracking software on people’s phones without permission? In this episode of Unwritten Law , Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione are joined by NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel Peggy Little to discuss Wright v. Goldstein , a case challenging Massachusetts’ use of COVID contact-tracing technology that was allegedly installed automatically on Android phones without users’ knowledge or consent. The lawsuit argued that the program violated the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, and computer intrusion laws by forcing software onto private phones and collecting sensitive data, including location and health information. The case resulted in a settlement requiring the state to delete the data and agree not to use similar technology for five years. This episode explains the case, the constitutional issues, and why the settlement could have nationwide implications for digital privacy and government surveillance.