Episode
SCOTUS Special (Part 3): A Major Win for Digital Privacy
- Podcast
- Unwritten Law
- Published
- Jul 14, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 1189
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/unwritten-law-7233280/episodes/scotus-special-part-3-a-major-win-for-digital-privacy/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/unwritten-law-7233280/scotus-special-part-3-a-major-win-for-digital-privacy.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In this episode of Unwritten Law , NCLA President and Chief Legal Officer Mark Chenoweth and Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione are joined by NCLA Staff Attorney Andreia Trifoi to discuss the Supreme Court's landmark Fourth Amendment decision in Chatrie v. United States . The Court held that the government's collection of cell phone location history through a geofence warrant constitutes a Fourth Amendment search—a significant victory for digital privacy and one of the Court's most important Fourth Amendment decisions since Carpenter v. United States . Andreia explains how geofence warrants work, why they can sweep millions of people's location records into a single investigation, and why the Court concluded that this type of dragnet surveillance implicates constitutional protections. The discussion also explores the relationship between Chatrie and Carpenter , the future of automatic license plate reader (ALPR) litigation, Justice Gorsuch's property-based concurrence, and what the decision could mean for emerging surveillance technologies. For anyone concerned about privacy in the digital age, Chatrie represents an important reaffirmation that constitutional protections must evolve alongside modern technology.