Episode

Does SEC Disgorgement Require Investor Harm?

Podcast
Unwritten Law
Published
Feb 24, 2026
Duration seconds
990
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://unwritten-law.captivate.fm/episode/does-sec-disgorgement-require-investor-harm
Audio
https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/ddaf0a29-8933-4b0c-9479-0df13ab4d272.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/unwritten-law-7233280/episodes/does-sec-disgorgement-require-investor-harm
Markdown
/podcast/unwritten-law-7233280/does-sec-disgorgement-require-investor-harm.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/unwritten-law-7233280/episodes/does-sec-disgorgement-require-investor-harm/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/unwritten-law-7233280/does-sec-disgorgement-require-investor-harm.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

In this episode of Unwritten Law , NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione is joined by NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel Kara Rollins to discuss Sripetch v. SEC , a securities law case scheduled to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in April. The case asks a critical question: must the Securities and Exchange Commission prove that investors suffered actual financial harm in order to obtain disgorgement in a civil enforcement action? John and Kara explain how recent Supreme Court decisions, including Kokesh and Liu , narrowed the SEC’s disgorgement authority while leaving this issue unresolved.