Episode
12: Jodi Arias Is Innocent? Competing Perspectives on a Murder Case
- Published
- Mar 4, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2322
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://audioboom.com/posts/8868554
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/unmarked-a-true-crime-podcast-7637226/episodes/12-jodi-arias-is-innocent-competing-perspectives-on-a-murder-case/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/unmarked-a-true-crime-podcast-7637226/12-jodi-arias-is-innocent-competing-perspectives-on-a-murder-case.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
I’m in Phoenix, Arizona, sitting down with a group called “Jodi Arias Is Innocent.” They aren’t arguing that Travis Alexander wasn’t killed — they’re arguing the case is more complicated than the verdict suggests. For this episode, I read Jodi Arias’ full appeal (300+ pages), spoke with her supporters, revisited the evidence, and re-examined what the trial did — and what it may have failed to weigh. We walk through the relationship, the timeline, the forensic sequence, and the competing interpretations — then we get to the part that won’t go away: allegations of misconduct, a media spectacle, and why the question at the center of this case is still open. At the end, you decide: not just what happened — but whether we got this right. Extended interview content referenced in the episode is available inside UNMARKED: Case Files our research archive on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Unmarked_TrueCrimePodcast Follow UNMARKED for additional case material, updates, and short-form analysis: • YouTube: @Unmarked_Podcast • Instagram: @unmarked_podcast • TikTok: @unmarkedpodcast • Patreon: / Unmarked_TrueCrimePodcast For readers interested in primary-source work on the Manson case, see Buddy’s book, Charles Manson: The Last Words : https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GQ6QRVQ7 UNMARKED: A True Crime Podcast is hosted by Audioboom.