Episode
Nolan Wells' Complete Timeline: July 3 Through July 6
- Published
- Jul 21, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2149
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://audioboom.com/posts/8930333
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/true-crime-today-daily-true-crime-news-interviews-568948/episodes/nolan-wells-complete-timeline-july-3-through-july-6/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/true-crime-today-daily-true-crime-news-interviews-568948/nolan-wells-complete-timeline-july-3-through-july-6.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Every timestamp in the Nolan Wells case, in sequence, from a Friday night dinner to a Monday morning recovery — a full chronological breakdown rather than another round of theories. The vessel's own movements are among the pieces that can be checked. It left a dock outside Ocean Springs mid-morning on the Fourth and reached the island a little after eleven. It pulled away at 4:31 and had to be towed part of the way in after the bilge pump quit. It entered Fort Bayou near 5:52, tied up at 6:06, went back out to a launch at 7:19, came out of the water, and finished the night on a trailer bound for Biloxi. All of it logged. What isn't logged is the part everybody wants. Why Nolan stayed. Whose version of that conversation holds up. What filled the stretch between the last sighting and the boat's exit. The search comes next, and it doesn't run the way people assume. His father was out on the water Sunday morning ahead of any agency, over the exact patch at the northwestern end, and came back with nothing. Monday at 8:45, a federal ranger recovered him from it. There's also what his mother says she found when that phone came back, what a friend says every phone out there looked like that day, and why those accounts don't cancel each other as cleanly as either camp would like. A grand jury is coming once investigators close, though prosecutors have been clear that convening one implies nothing about criminality. Tony Brueski holds the checkable apart from the assumed and is direct that his own conclusions carry no special authority, because he wasn't standing on that sandbar. The sequence is here. The verdict isn't, because there isn't one. END_LINKS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch th…