Episode

Alex Murdaugh Retrial: Former Prosecutor on the Ruling, the Evidence, and the Fight

Podcast
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Published
May 15, 2026
Duration seconds
3270
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://audioboom.com/posts/8903711
Audio
https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/audioboom.com/posts/8903711.mp3?modified=1778786177&sid=5001260&source=rss
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/true-crime-today-daily-true-crime-news-interviews-568948/episodes/alex-murdaugh-retrial-former-prosecutor-on-the-ruling-the-evidence-and-the-fight
Markdown
/podcast/true-crime-today-daily-true-crime-news-interviews-568948/alex-murdaugh-retrial-former-prosecutor-on-the-ruling-the-evidence-and-the-fight.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/true-crime-today-daily-true-crime-news-interviews-568948/episodes/alex-murdaugh-retrial-former-prosecutor-on-the-ruling-the-evidence-and-the-fight/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/true-crime-today-daily-true-crime-news-interviews-568948/alex-murdaugh-retrial-former-prosecutor-on-the-ruling-the-evidence-and-the-fight.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

The South Carolina Supreme Court threw out Alex Murdaugh’s murder convictions, restricted the evidence that dominated his first trial, and rewrote the legal standard for jury tampering claims in the state. Eric Faddis — a former prosecutor who now practices defense — provides the full analysis. The ruling: Toal placed the burden on Murdaugh, violated evidence rules by questioning jurors about their mental processes, and relied on testimony that was inadmissible. The court adopted the Cheek framework, making it the governing standard in South Carolina, and found the State could not prove the verdict was unaffected by Hill’s comments. The evidence: twelve and a half hours of financial crimes testimony flagged as excessive. The motive timeline survives. The inflammatory details do not. The defense also has unresolved challenges to forensic evidence the court declined to address. The retrial: Murdaugh’s prior testimony locked in as a prosecution asset. Hill’s conviction as a potential defense narrative. A venue fight with no obvious answer. And Faddis’ answer to the question every trial lawyer in the country is asking — which side would you rather be on? LINKS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod DISCLAIMER This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law…