Episode

Episode 120: Popper on Trial

Podcast
The Theory of Anything
Published
Nov 11, 2025
Duration seconds
6676
Processing state
processed
Canonical source
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/four-strands/episodes/Episode-120-Popper-on-Trial-e39ef76
Audio
https://anchor.fm/s/14b6fc10/podcast/play/109574822/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2025-9-12%2F660683b5-73c6-00c3-e0d8-c2b146ecd69a.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/the-theory-of-anything-859886/episodes/episode-120-popper-on-trial
Markdown
/podcast/the-theory-of-anything-859886/episode-120-popper-on-trial.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-theory-of-anything-859886/episodes/episode-120-popper-on-trial/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-theory-of-anything-859886/episode-120-popper-on-trial.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

This week Bruce puts Popper on trial. Specifically, through the lens of Michael Stevens’s book, The Knowledge Machine , which argues that science works because it follows the “iron law of explanation” where scientists must (at least in public) put aside philosophy, politics, and theology and only follow empirical evidence. Bruce asks, how compatible is this view with the epistemology of Karl Popper?And does Strevens' critique of Popper ring true? Or is it a strawman?