Episode

What's At Stake in Chatrie v. United States

Podcast
The Tech Policy Press Podcast
Published
May 17, 2026
Duration seconds
2495
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://techpolicy.press/whats-at-stake-in-chatrie-v-united-states
Audio
https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/d492948c-50cb-4c3b-992d-bed03695dacc.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/the-tech-policy-press-podcast-1378134/episodes/what-s-at-stake-in-chatrie-v-united-states
Markdown
/podcast/the-tech-policy-press-podcast-1378134/what-s-at-stake-in-chatrie-v-united-states.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-tech-policy-press-podcast-1378134/episodes/what-s-at-stake-in-chatrie-v-united-states/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-tech-policy-press-podcast-1378134/what-s-at-stake-in-chatrie-v-united-states.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

At the end of last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Chatrie v. United States . The case involves the use of a geofence warrant , which police use to demand information on all cellphones within a certain area and period of time. The outcome of the case, which revolves around Fourth Amendment questions, could have profound implications for location tracking and privacy in the digital age. To learn more, Tech Policy Press fellow Jake Laperruque , who is monitoring the case , spoke to Michael Price , who serves as litigation director for the Fourth Amendment Center at National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), one of the lawyers representing the plaintiff.