Episode

Why Would Alex Murdaugh’s Lawyers Tease New Suspects Before Filing Any Motions?

Podcast
The Re-Trial Of Alex Murdaugh
Published
May 19, 2026
Duration seconds
957
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://audioboom.com/posts/8905066
Audio
https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/audioboom.com/posts/8905066.mp3?modified=1779136002&sid=5097527&source=rss
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/the-re-trial-of-alex-murdaugh-5989088/episodes/why-would-alex-murdaugh-s-lawyers-tease-new-suspects-before-filing-any-motions
Markdown
/podcast/the-re-trial-of-alex-murdaugh-5989088/why-would-alex-murdaugh-s-lawyers-tease-new-suspects-before-filing-any-motions.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-re-trial-of-alex-murdaugh-5989088/episodes/why-would-alex-murdaugh-s-lawyers-tease-new-suspects-before-filing-any-motions/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-re-trial-of-alex-murdaugh-5989088/why-would-alex-murdaugh-s-lawyers-tease-new-suspects-before-filing-any-motions.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

The defense went on national television and said they have information about “third parties and potential motives.” They said the Supreme Court reversal gives them subpoena power. They wouldn’t elaborate. And they haven’t filed a single motion about any of it. Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke answer the listener question that connects the dots: If Harpootlian and Griffin have genuine evidence of another person involved in the murders, why announce it on a morning show instead of in a courtroom? Is this a legal strategy preview or a pretrial narrative campaign? Robin examines both possibilities. The evidence has always contained threads that raise the third-party question—two weapons, no recovery, a defendant whose only proven history of arranging violence involved recruiting Curtis Eddie Smith. The pattern of delegation is real and documented. But Robin also pushes hard on the gap between having information and having evidence. People reaching out with theories is not the same as people with firsthand knowledge willing to testify under oath. Tony walks through the specific things the defense would need to present in trial two to make a third-party theory stick—and the risks of running that strategy if the evidence underneath it isn’t airtight. The conversation gets into the deepest strategic question of the retrial. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication…