Episode
The Quill & Sword | CAAF Chats Ep 67: United States v. Arroyo (C.A.A.F. 2025)
- Podcast
- The Quill & Sword
- Published
- Apr 1, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 444
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-quill-sword-5815850/episodes/the-quill-sword-caaf-chats-ep-67-united-states-v-arroyo-c-a-a-f-2025/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-quill-sword-5815850/the-quill-sword-caaf-chats-ep-67-united-states-v-arroyo-c-a-a-f-2025.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In this episode, we discuss the scope of sentence appropriateness and whether Courts of Criminal Appeals may consider the terms of a plea agreement in their review. We offer practical considerations for trial practitioners in drafting plea agreements in light of the CAAF’s opinion. Learn more about The Quill & Sword series of podcasts by visiting our podcast page at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/thequillandsword. The Quill & Sword show includes featured episodes from across the JAGC, plus all episodes from our four separate shows: “Criminal Law Department Presents” (Criminal Law Department), “NSL Unscripted” (National Security Law Department), “The FAR and Beyond” (Contract & Fiscal Law Department) and “Hold My Reg” (Administrative & Civil Law Department). Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/.