Episode

Canada Hedges Against the United States, With Jonathan Berkshire Miller

Podcast
The President’s Inbox
Published
Feb 4, 2026
Duration seconds
1929
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://thepresidentsinbox.podbean.com/e/canada-hedges-against-the-united-states-with-jonathan-berkshire-miller/
Audio
https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/ig2m9ywacqgpeisi/260204_TPI-MASTER.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/the-president-s-inbox-1112599/episodes/canada-hedges-against-the-united-states-with-jonathan-berkshire-miller
Markdown
/podcast/the-president-s-inbox-1112599/canada-hedges-against-the-united-states-with-jonathan-berkshire-miller.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-president-s-inbox-1112599/episodes/canada-hedges-against-the-united-states-with-jonathan-berkshire-miller/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-president-s-inbox-1112599/canada-hedges-against-the-united-states-with-jonathan-berkshire-miller.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Jonathan Berkshire Miller, senior fellow at the Macdonald Laurier Institute, sits down with James M. Lindsay to discuss Canada's effort to diminish its vulnerability to U.S. economic threats and just how much middle powers like Canada can successfully hedge in a world of great power competition. Mentioned on the Episode: “Live From Davos: Exclusive Interview With Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent,” Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec Mark Carney, “Principled and Pragmatic: Canada’s Path,” Office of the Prime Minister of Canada “Canada's Arctic Foreign Policy,” Government of Canada. Updated March 25, 2025 For an episode transcript and show notes, visit The President’s Inbox at: https://www.cfr.org/podcasts/presidents-inbox/canada-hedges-against-the-united-states Opinions expressed on The President’s Inbox are solely those of the host or our guests, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions on matters of policy.