Episode
Unconscionability in High-Dollar Commercial Deals: When Sophisticated Parties Still Get Protected
- Podcast
- The Legal Podcast Network
- Published
- Jun 22, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 929
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-legal-podcast-network-6936259/episodes/unconscionability-in-high-dollar-commercial-deals-when-sophisticated-parties-still-get-protected/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-legal-podcast-network-6936259/unconscionability-in-high-dollar-commercial-deals-when-sophisticated-parties-still-get-protected.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In this episode of Litigation and Capital, Steven Mirsky, founder of Mirsky Corporate Advisors, delves into the complexities of unconscionability in commercial contracts. Steven explains how courts differentiate between procedural and substantive unconscionability, particularly in high-dollar agreements between sophisticated parties. The discussion covers various scenarios, such as rushed negotiations and contracts of adhesion, and how courts evaluate the fairness of terms. Steven shares insights from real cases, highlighting the importance of meaningful consent and the challenges of proving unconscionability. The episode provides valuable guidance for CEOs and business leaders on negotiating contracts and recognizing potential pitfalls. Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of how to protect their interests in complex legal landscapes.