Episode
Lawfare Daily: The TPS Cases at the Supreme Court, with Geoffrey Pipoly and Andrew Tauber
- Published
- Apr 24, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 3198
- Processing state
processed- Canonical source
- https://shows.acast.com/the-lawfare-podcast-patreon-edition/episodes/lawfare-daily-the-tps-cases-at-the-supreme-court-with-geoffr
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-lawfare-podcast-patreon-edition-6936765/episodes/lawfare-daily-the-tps-cases-at-the-supreme-court-with-geoffrey-pipoly-and-andrew-tauber/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-lawfare-podcast-patreon-edition-6936765/lawfare-daily-the-tps-cases-at-the-supreme-court-with-geoffrey-pipoly-and-andrew-tauber.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Geoffrey Pipoly and Andrew Tauber, partners at the Bryan Cave law firm, speak with Senior Editor Roger Parloff about their case, known at the Supreme Court level as Trump v. Miot . In it, they have been fighting to preserve Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for more than 350,000 Haitian immigrants. The Court is hearing the case on April 29, along with Mullin v. Dahlia Doe , which concerns the government’s attempt to terminate TPS status for about 7,000 Syrians. Pipoly and Tauber explain what the TPS program is and why they contend that the government’s attempt to terminate it for Haitians violates the TPS statute, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the equal protection component of the Due Process clause of the U.S. Constitution. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.