Episode

Remembered Homelands, Divided Lands: Ottoman Legacies and the Roots of Ethnic Conflict

Podcast
The Institute of World Politics
Published
May 19, 2026
Duration seconds
1649
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://soundcloud.com/theiwp/remembered-homelands-divided
Audio
https://feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/2323831004-theiwp-remembered-homelands-divided.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/the-institute-of-world-politics-1100153/episodes/remembered-homelands-divided-lands-ottoman-legacies-and-the-roots-of-ethnic-conflict
Markdown
/podcast/the-institute-of-world-politics-1100153/remembered-homelands-divided-lands-ottoman-legacies-and-the-roots-of-ethnic-conflict.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-institute-of-world-politics-1100153/episodes/remembered-homelands-divided-lands-ottoman-legacies-and-the-roots-of-ethnic-conflict/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-institute-of-world-politics-1100153/remembered-homelands-divided-lands-ottoman-legacies-and-the-roots-of-ethnic-conflict.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

This talk argues that the ethnic conflicts of Southeast Europe are not the result of “ancient hatreds,” but of a specific historical configuration shaped during the Ottoman period. Under Ottoman rule, earlier forms of statehood did not disappear but survived in memory and identity in a kind of “suspended animation,” while at the same time demographic structures were significantly reshaped. Conflict emerged where these two processes intersected. In regions such as Kosovo, Bosnia, Vojvodina, and Transylvania, one group could claim historical precedence based on earlier statehood, while another could claim legitimacy based on later demographic dominance. The Greek–Turkish case shows a similar pattern, where a Byzantine territorial memory and Turkish nationhood collided over territories that became ethnically mixed during the Ottoman rule. The result is a particular type of conflict: not between truth and falsehood, but between competing and internally coherent forms of historical legitimacy — where both sides can plausibly claim that the land is, in different senses, their own. Csaba B. Horváth, PhD earned his PhD in International Relations at Corvinus University of Budapest after completing degrees in History and Political Science at Eötvös Loránd University. He is a member of the General Assembly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. His research focuses on geopolitics, with a particular emphasis on the Indo-Pacific as well as on Central and Eastern Europe. He has held visiting research fellowships at several universities in Australia, China and Taiwan, and earlier in his youth, spent two years living in Japan, where he acquired conversational proficiency in Japanese. He is also a regular participant in international conferences and held public talks across the Indo-Pac…