Episode

Banning Congress, Not Markets: The Insider Trading Dilemma

Podcast
The Human Action Podcast
Published
Mar 3, 2026
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://mises.org/podcasts/human-action-podcast/banning-congress-not-markets-insider-trading-dilemma
Audio
https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/cdn.mises.org/2026-03/HAPod-540-20260303.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/the-human-action-podcast-1569402/episodes/banning-congress-not-markets-the-insider-trading-dilemma
Markdown
/podcast/the-human-action-podcast-1569402/banning-congress-not-markets-the-insider-trading-dilemma.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-human-action-podcast-1569402/episodes/banning-congress-not-markets-the-insider-trading-dilemma/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-human-action-podcast-1569402/banning-congress-not-markets-the-insider-trading-dilemma.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Bob uses Trump’s call to ban congressional insider trading as a springboard to explain why, from an Austro-libertarian perspective, insider trading and speculation could help markets work, while still justifying special rules for government employees. Related: Bob's Article "Is Insider Trading Really a Crime?": Mises.org/HAP540a The Social Function of Stock Speculators: Mises.org/HAP540b The Social Function of Futures Markets: Mises.org/HAP540c The Social Function of Call and Put Options: Mises.org/HAP540d The Mises Institute is giving away 100,000 copies of Hayek for the 21st Century. Get your free copy at Mises.org/HAPodFree