Episode

142 - Please Harvard! Don't get it wrong this time!! What's wrong with a cap on A's - a discussion with Dr. Stephanie Valentine

Podcast
The Grading Podcast
Published
Mar 31, 2026
Duration seconds
3721
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://thegradingpod.com/podcast-test-page/142-please-harvard-dont-get-it-wrong-this-time-whats-wrong-with-a-cap-on-as-a-discussion-with-dr-stephanie-valentine
Audio
https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/634472ce-83bb-4c56-8781-413819b79476.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/the-grading-podcast-6385485/episodes/142-please-harvard-don-t-get-it-wrong-this-time-what-s-wrong-with-a-cap-on-a-s-a-discussion-with-dr-stephanie-valentine
Markdown
/podcast/the-grading-podcast-6385485/142-please-harvard-don-t-get-it-wrong-this-time-what-s-wrong-with-a-cap-on-a-s-a-discussion-with-dr-stephanie-valentine.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-grading-podcast-6385485/episodes/142-please-harvard-don-t-get-it-wrong-this-time-what-s-wrong-with-a-cap-on-a-s-a-discussion-with-dr-stephanie-valentine/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-grading-podcast-6385485/142-please-harvard-don-t-get-it-wrong-this-time-what-s-wrong-with-a-cap-on-a-s-a-discussion-with-dr-stephanie-valentine.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

In this follow-up to their earlier conversation about Harvard and “too many A’s,” Sharona and Boz welcome back Dr. Stephanie Valentine to unpack Harvard’s proposed new grading policy, which would cap the number of A grades in each class and layer course-based ranking on top of an already troubled system. Drawing on Stephanie’s powerful “Points Are Insidious” manifesto and her experience teaching high-achieving, perfectionistic students, the episode explores how policies built to force distinction can intensify anxiety, undermine risk-taking, discourage collaboration, and ultimately work against the very innovation and intellectual curiosity elite institutions claim to value. Together, the three of them critique the mathematical and ethical flaws of ranking students against one another, examine the gap between top-down policy and classroom reality, and wrestle with what it would mean for faculty to live with integrity under a policy like this—while also reaffirming that the real alternative is not inflated or meaningless grades, but grading systems genuinely grounded in learning, growth, and student wellbeing. Links Please note - any books linked here are likely Amazon Associates links. Clicking on them and purchasing through them helps support the show. Thanks for your support! Grade-inflation panel says updated plan focuses on reining in A’s, restoring integrity of system, freeing students to follow curiosity The “Points Are Insidious” Manifesto, Part 3: Perfectionism Is Not Excellence , by Dr. Stephanie Valentine Grade Caps Fail the Game Theory Exam , from The Crimson Tide (Harvard Newspapr) The “Points are Insidious” Manifesto (Part I) , by Dr. Stephanie Valentine The “Points Are Insidious” Manifesto, Part II: Assessing at the Boiling Point , by Dr. Stephanie Valent…