Episode

A Very Brief Interview with Klaus Schwab

Podcast
The Good Fight
Published
Mar 10, 2026
Duration seconds
1352
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pscrb.fm/rss/p/clrtpod.com/m/traffic.megaphone.fm/TGF4811247292.mp3?updated=1773098453
Audio
https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pscrb.fm/rss/p/clrtpod.com/m/traffic.megaphone.fm/TGF4811247292.mp3?updated=1773098453
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/the-good-fight-1115114/episodes/a-very-brief-interview-with-klaus-schwab
Markdown
/podcast/the-good-fight-1115114/a-very-brief-interview-with-klaus-schwab.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-good-fight-1115114/episodes/a-very-brief-interview-with-klaus-schwab/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-good-fight-1115114/a-very-brief-interview-with-klaus-schwab.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Yascha Mounk and Klaus Schwab discuss truth, trust, and accountability—until he abruptly ended the interview. In January, I received an email from Klaus Schwab about a new book he had just published, called Restoring Truth and Trust. It was, he told me, “part of my broader series aimed at helping a global audience understand and respond to the profound changes shaping our societies, economies, and institutions.” I decided to invite Schwab onto my podcast. In his role at Davos, he had helped to shape, or at least to midwife, the global order which is now suffering an unprecedented crisis. Given the themes of his book, he seemed open to a genuinely searching conversation about which elements of this order were worth preserving, which others in need of jettisoning—and what responsibility the elites he knew so well might have for our current travails. I was greatly looking forward to the conversation, and approached it the way I do most of my podcasts: I was determined both to give Schwab an opportunity to present his ideas in the most compelling possible way, and to interrogate them critically. A few questions in, it became clear that the conversation was not going well. Whenever I mildly pushed back at some point he was making, Schwab looked visibly annoyed. After about twenty minutes, he suddenly broke off the conversation, saying that he had a migraine. After giving Schwab time to recover, a member of his team stepped in and requested that we reschedule the conversation, which we were happy to do in the circumstances. Naturally, we gave Schwab’s team many opportunities to resume the conversation. We offered numerous options for when we could record the rest of the conversation, and invited them to suggest a time that would work for him. But after a few back-and-forth e…