Episode
Bombshell New Evidence in the O.J. Simpson Case Feat. Chris Todd
- Podcast
- THE ED MYLETT SHOW
- Published
- May 5, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 3857
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-ed-mylett-show-743187/episodes/bombshell-new-evidence-in-the-o-j-simpson-case-feat-chris-todd/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-ed-mylett-show-743187/bombshell-new-evidence-in-the-o-j-simpson-case-feat-chris-todd.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Download the Whatnot app today and get free shipping on your first order. Just search Whatnot and start scoring amazing deals. Start paying bills the smart way, not the hard way at QuickBooks.com/billpay. Terms apply. Money movement services are provided by Intuit Payments Inc., licensed as a Money Transmitter by the New York State Department of Financial Services What if the O. J. Simpson murder case still has explosive evidence the world has never fully seen? Today’s episode is one of the most shocking and controversial conversations we’ve ever had on this show. I sat down with Chris Todd, a veteran private investigator who has spent years digging into the O. J. Simpson case, and what he shares will challenge everything you think you know about it. This is not just another recap of a famous trial. This is a deep dive into potential new evidence, overlooked details, and a theory that could completely change the narrative of what happened that night. Chris lays out a case that goes far beyond what most people heard during the trial. He believes there is compelling evidence that suggests multiple people may have been involved and that critical pieces of information were never fully explored or presented. We get into details about additional blood evidence, multiple footprints, and inconsistencies that raise serious questions about how the case was investigated and ultimately presented to the public. If even part of what he is saying is accurate, it could reshape how this entire case is viewed. We walk through the timeline step by step, from the moments leading up to the crime to what may have happened immediately after. I pressed him on the details, the logic, and the gaps, because I know you’re going to be asking those same questions. And what you’ll hear is a perspect…