Episode
My Most Requested Case Ever: Investigating the Shroud of Turin
- Published
- Apr 22, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 5993
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-cold-case-christianity-podcast-1067226/episodes/my-most-requested-case-ever-investigating-the-shroud-of-turin/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-cold-case-christianity-podcast-1067226/my-most-requested-case-ever-investigating-the-shroud-of-turin.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In this episode, cold-case homicide detective and Christian apologist J. Warner Wallace finally turns his investigative lens on one of the most talked-about religious artifacts in history: the Shroud of Turin. Is it a medieval forgery created for profit, or a powerful piece of physical evidence that points to the crucifixion of Jesus? J. Warner walks through the chain of custody, the historical record, the scientific testing, and the forensic details, while also exposing the limits of what any single piece of evidence can truly prove. Drawing on decades of experience presenting cases to juries, he explains how a detective evaluates artifacts, weighs competing explanations, and navigates the space between "possible" and "reasonable" doubt. He also shows why—even if the Shroud were authentic—it could never replace the historical case for the resurrection grounded in early eyewitness testimony. If you've ever wondered whether Christians should use the Shroud of Turin when making a case for Christianity, or avoid it altogether, this episode will help you think it through carefully. If this conversation is helpful to you, please subscribe to the Cold-Case Christianity podcast and take a moment to leave a rating and review in your podcast app. Your feedback helps more people discover the show and join the conversation about the evidence for the Christian worldview.