Episode
Human, but Not a Person? Answering Kate Greasley
- Podcast
- The Case for Life
- Published
- Jun 17, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 1690
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-case-for-life-6591627/episodes/human-but-not-a-person-answering-kate-greasley/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-case-for-life-6591627/human-but-not-a-person-answering-kate-greasley.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Either every human being shares an equal right to life, or human value rests on traits — self-awareness, rationality, the ability to feel pain — that none of us possess in equal measure. Oxford philosopher Kate Greasley grants that the unborn are human but denies they are persons, offering one of the most sophisticated cases on the pro-choice side, and Scott Klusendorf shows why her arguments, however winsome, can't deliver the human equality she still wants to keep. Find out how to answer one of the brightest voices on the other side without being intimidated, on this episode of The Case for Life. Be sure to subscribe to PassionLife The Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, or your favorite podcast app so you never miss a single episode. Follow PassionLife on Rumble, Youtube, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter to be kept up to date on everything God is doing through the work of PassionLife. Partner with PassionLife as a donor at https://www.passionlife.org/donate. Send Tiny Baby: https://tinybaby.org