Episode

White v. North Louisiana Criminalistics Laboratory

Podcast
Swear on the Stand
Published
May 8, 2026
Duration seconds
2323
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/danielswear/episodes/White-v--North-Louisiana-Criminalistics-Laboratory-e3iups4
Audio
https://anchor.fm/s/fddb5314/podcast/play/119547204/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2026-4-6%2Fb652d9fd-dbce-4d42-84de-7128b1007cab.m4a
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/episodes/white-v-north-louisiana-criminalistics-laboratory
Markdown
/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/white-v-north-louisiana-criminalistics-laboratory.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/episodes/white-v-north-louisiana-criminalistics-laboratory/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/white-v-north-louisiana-criminalistics-laboratory.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

In this episode, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld a lower court's decision to dismiss a lawsuit involving allegations of employment discrimination and retaliation . The plaintiff, a former firearms supervisor at the North Louisiana Criminalistics Laboratory , argued she was fired based on her gender and in response to her internal complaints. However, the court determined she failed to prove a prima facie case of sex discrimination because she was replaced by another woman and could not identify similarly situated male colleagues who were treated better. Furthermore, the judges found no evidence that the employer's reasons for termination were pretextual , noting a documented history of insubordination, poor performance, and dishonesty . Ultimately, the court concluded that the laboratory had legitimate, non-discriminatory grounds for its actions, thereby affirming the summary judgment in favor of the defendant.