Episode

Larkins v. S.D.P. Manufacturing: Due Diligence in Process Service

Podcast
Swear on the Stand
Published
Jul 8, 2026
Duration seconds
2504
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/danielswear/episodes/Larkins-v--S-D-P--Manufacturing-Due-Diligence-in-Process-Service-e3l1cvs
Audio
https://anchor.fm/s/fddb5314/podcast/play/121729468/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2026-5-19%2F7f2b1a59-9a8d-5c05-8589-145a96113f58.m4a
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/episodes/larkins-v-s-d-p-manufacturing-due-diligence-in-process-service
Markdown
/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/larkins-v-s-d-p-manufacturing-due-diligence-in-process-service.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/episodes/larkins-v-s-d-p-manufacturing-due-diligence-in-process-service/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/larkins-v-s-d-p-manufacturing-due-diligence-in-process-service.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

This episode details a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision regarding whether a lawsuit was filed and served within the required statute of limitations . The court reversed a lower court's dismissal of the case, ruling that the plaintiffs demonstrated sufficient diligence in effecting service despite a 50-day delay. The opinion clarifies that under Texas law , plaintiffs are held to a standard of ordinary prudence rather than perfection, especially when facing external disruptions like a courthouse fire. By providing a bona fide explanation for lapses in communication with their process server, the plaintiffs created a factual dispute that should be decided by a jury rather than a judge. Ultimately, the court emphasized that minimal delays do not automatically negate a claim if the legal team remains active in pursuing the defendants.