Episode
Hunter v. United States: Limits of Sentence Appeal Waivers
- Podcast
- Swear on the Stand
- Published
- Jul 9, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2859
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/episodes/hunter-v-united-states-limits-of-sentence-appeal-waivers/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/hunter-v-united-states-limits-of-sentence-appeal-waivers.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
The provided episode discusses a Supreme Court of the United States opinion from the June 2026 case Hunter v. United States . The Court addressed whether a knowing and voluntary appeal waiver in a plea agreement is enforceable if the resulting sentence involves an egregious judicial error . Delivering the majority opinion, Justice Kagan established a "miscarriage of justice" exception , ruling that waivers cannot bar appeals in extreme cases that would discredit the federal judiciary's integrity . Such exceptions include sentences exceeding statutory maximums , those based on unconstitutional factors like race, or those imposed without civilized procedure . Justice Gorsuch concurred to critique the coercive nature of modern plea bargaining, while Justice Thomas dissented, arguing the Court lacks the authority to override valid contracts based on policy concerns. The decision ultimately vacated the Fifth Circuit's dismissal of Munson Hunter’s appeal, remanding the case for further review under this new standard.