Episode
Top 10 Most Controversial Refereeing Decisions
- Podcast
- Sport Is History
- Published
- May 15, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 1378
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR7344627089.mp3
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/sport-is-history-7805910/episodes/top-10-most-controversial-refereeing-decisions/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/sport-is-history-7805910/top-10-most-controversial-refereeing-decisions.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Being a referee isn't exactly easy...but it becomes a whole lot harder when you get it wrong! In this bonus episode, Mark and Marcus look back on some of the most outrageous refereeing decisions in football, both club and country. From incorrect offside calls to overzealous bookings, the pair break down some of the worst and most interesting choices made by referees. Stories include the 2009 Chelsea v Barcelona Champions League semi-final, Pedro Mendes' halfway line strike from 2005 against Manchester United and referee Wolf-Dieter Ahlenfelder's alcoholic indulgence before a game alongside many more. Every week, Mark Pougatch and Marcus Buckland unpack unbelievable stories from the world of sporting history. Tik Tok Instagram YouTube Produced by Spiritland Creative Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices