Episode

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts - The Term the Court Stopped Pretending

Podcast
Slate Daily Feed
Published
Jul 11, 2026
Duration seconds
3648
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://shows.acast.com/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts/episodes/6a5182ed8716ffeabeedc5bb
Audio
https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/695ea2381c1db1c5bdf7c59b/a/slatedailyfeed-podcasts/e/6a5182ed8716ffeabeedc5bb/media.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/slate-daily-feed-530620/episodes/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-the-term-the-court-stopped-pretending
Markdown
/podcast/slate-daily-feed-530620/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-the-term-the-court-stopped-pretending.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/slate-daily-feed-530620/episodes/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-the-term-the-court-stopped-pretending/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/slate-daily-feed-530620/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-courts-the-term-the-court-stopped-pretending.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

The Supreme Court just wrapped one of its most consequential terms in decades—and Amicus brought together three heavyweight legal experts to break down the damage. Their conversation centers on the biggest themes of the recent term: Congress has been sidelined completely; the Court is the final arbiter of all things; hubris has become the methodology, and the midterms should worry us all.   Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern are joined by civil rights lawyer Sherrilyn Ifill, legal historian Nikolas Bowie, and Supreme Court expert Stephen Vladeck. The panel dissects a term defined by judicial supremacy: the gutting of the Voting Rights Act in Callais and Milligan , the “unitary executive” power grab in Trump v. Slaughter , the birthright citizenship fight that never should have been argued, and a shadow docket that increasingly infects the merits docket. They trace how the court has hollowed out Congress' power to legislate, rewritten the meaning of the Reconstruction Amendments, and applied its own rules with striking inconsistency—all while shrugging off any need to justify itself. The conversation closes with a hard question: What can actually be done about a court that’s this unaccountable? The panel offers concrete ideas, from congressional hearings on court reform to a new Voting Rights Act—and the hosts preview Amicus' upcoming series, By the People. This is part of Opinionpalooza , Slate’s coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court. The best way to support our work is by joining Slate Plus . (If you are already a member, consider a donation or merch !) Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subs…