Episode

What Did the So-Called 'Lying Monk' Really See?

Podcast
Skeptical Inquirer Audio Edition
Published
Jul 1, 2026
Duration seconds
1111
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://3e64cc12-0a9b-49a7-be84-de7d280b7a8c.libsyn.com/what-did-the-so-called-lying-monk-really-see
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/3e64cc12-0a9b-49a7-be84-de7d280b7a8c/Sharps_Price-Sharps_-_What_Did_the_So-Called_Lying_Monk_Really_See_-_Read_by_AI_Oscar_en_v3.mp3?dest-id=4375028
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/skeptical-inquirer-audio-edition-7055829/episodes/what-did-the-so-called-lying-monk-really-see
Markdown
/podcast/skeptical-inquirer-audio-edition-7055829/what-did-the-so-called-lying-monk-really-see.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/skeptical-inquirer-audio-edition-7055829/episodes/what-did-the-so-called-lying-monk-really-see/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/skeptical-inquirer-audio-edition-7055829/what-did-the-so-called-lying-monk-really-see.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Matthew J. Sharps and Jana L. Price-Sharps examine the legend of the so-called "Lying Monk," Fray Marcos de Niza, arguing that psychology—not deception—best explains the myths surrounding his expedition to Cibola. Using examples of source confusion, language ambiguity, misinterpretation, and faulty perception, they show how ordinary cognitive processes can transform modest observations into enduring legends of lost cities, strange beasts, and giants. Read this article and find accompanying references at: https://skepticalinquirer.org/2026/06/what-did-the-so-called-lying-monk-really-see/ About the Authors: Matthew J. Sharps is professor of psychology at California State University, Fresno. He is the author of numerous papers and publications in cognitive and forensic cognitive science, including the 2022 book Processing under Pressure: Stress, Memory, and Decision-Making in Law Enforcement (3rd ed.). He has consulted on eyewitness issues in numerous criminal cases and has published several articles in Skeptical Inquirer on the implications of eyewitness principles for erroneous observations and interpretations. Jana L. Price-Sharps is a licensed psychologist who specializes in trauma treatment with forensic and first responder populations. She is a full-time faculty member at Walden University in the Forensic Psychology PhD program and a part-time faculty member in the Department of Psychology at California State University, Fresno. She conducts research on interactive factors in forensic, clinical, and cognitive psychology. Subscribe to Skeptical Inquirer: https://skepticalinquirer.org/subscribe/