Episode
Andrew Huberman: King of the Griftoverse (a compilation video series)
- Podcast
- Scott Carney Investigates
- Published
- Apr 22, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 14823
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/scott-carney-investigates-6090937/episodes/andrew-huberman-king-of-the-griftoverse-a-compilation-video-series/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/scott-carney-investigates-6090937/andrew-huberman-king-of-the-griftoverse-a-compilation-video-series.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
This is a four hour compilation video about the reliability of the neuroscientist Andrew Huberman.04:19 Documenting Andrew Huberman's Lies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0thkoCYhJnc32:49 Liquid IV, LMNT, and the "Dehydrated Soda" Business Model https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5Tv_22ojbw49:17 Why did Huberman endorse Susanna Søberg's bad science? https://youtu.be/dODmftCtLtc1:13:31 Huberman's Outrageous Conflict of Interest at Cell Reports Medicine https://youtu.be/Pqv4MMZkuiw1:18:50 What's Wrong with Andrew Huberman's Science? | ft Dr. Andrea Love https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ws96_jZrNw2:17:30 What will Happen to Andrew Huberman Now? https://youtu.be/d1oTcX7SoE82:30:40 Introducing Joe Rogan's Deleted Huberman Footage (I sat through 3 hours so you didn't have to) https://youtu.be/o7eCX_W7oAo3:06:12 Huberman Finally Responds https://youtu.be/0RHaNpOprNc3:47:57 Why I fell for Andrew Huberman and Wim Hof https://youtu.be/K6WiWWG93-4Get Early Access on Substackhttps://sgcarney.substack.com/Join this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3PyxGKt94kLzVqkkjEgRFw/joinScott Carney Homepage:https://www.scottcarney.comPatreon: https://patreon.com/sgcarneySPONSOR THIS CHANNEL:(Rate Sheet) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WZcGlb0r3d4iZjduPcVcqEqF05vsGdHO/view?usp=sharingDISCLAIMER: (Updated Mar 2026): All content herein constitutes commentary and opinion based on investigative journalism conducted with (i) publicly available documents, (ii) interviews, and (iii) other verifiable sources. References to “scams,” “fraud,” “theft,” or related terms should not be taken as definitive findings of fact or legal conclusions. Facts, evidence, and independent analysis are used in this program to draw strongly opinionated conclusions, but it is importa…