Episode

Why Behavioral Science Beats Courtroom Folklore

Podcast
Science of Justice
Published
Jun 10, 2026
Duration seconds
2213
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2235471/episodes/19316019-why-behavioral-science-beats-courtroom-folklore.mp3
Audio
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2235471/episodes/19316019-why-behavioral-science-beats-courtroom-folklore.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/science-of-justice-6578676/episodes/why-behavioral-science-beats-courtroom-folklore
Markdown
/podcast/science-of-justice-6578676/why-behavioral-science-beats-courtroom-folklore.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/science-of-justice-6578676/episodes/why-behavioral-science-beats-courtroom-folklore/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/science-of-justice-6578676/why-behavioral-science-beats-courtroom-folklore.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Send us Fan Mail Trial lawyers often rely on courtroom advice that sounds true because it has been repeated for years. But juries do not decide cases based on folklore. In this episode, we look at how behavioral science helps plaintiff trial teams test assumptions, understand juror attitudes, and strengthen case strategy before trial. What This Episode Covers Why common jury myths can mislead trial teams How confirmation bias shapes case strategy Why job titles and...