Episode

When Facts Fail: The Litigation Intelligence Stack

Podcast
Science of Justice
Published
Mar 17, 2026
Duration seconds
2106
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2235471/episodes/18852600-when-facts-fail-the-litigation-intelligence-stack.mp3
Audio
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2235471/episodes/18852600-when-facts-fail-the-litigation-intelligence-stack.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/science-of-justice-6578676/episodes/when-facts-fail-the-litigation-intelligence-stack
Markdown
/podcast/science-of-justice-6578676/when-facts-fail-the-litigation-intelligence-stack.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/science-of-justice-6578676/episodes/when-facts-fail-the-litigation-intelligence-stack/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/science-of-justice-6578676/when-facts-fail-the-litigation-intelligence-stack.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Send us Fan Mail Trial teams often walk into court with evidence that feels airtight. The documents line up. The timeline makes sense. The experts support the theory. But once the jury room door closes, that certainty can fall apart. Jurors do not process evidence the way lawyers do. They interpret it through story, emotion, and their own experiences. In this episode, we discuss: The litigation intelligence gap and why lawyers and jurors often see the same evidence very differentlyWhy evidenc...