Episode
From Gut Feel to Juror Science: How Data Quality Decides Plaintiff Outcomes
- Podcast
- Science of Justice
- Published
- Oct 16, 2025
- Duration seconds
- 2152
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/science-of-justice-6578676/episodes/from-gut-feel-to-juror-science-how-data-quality-decides-plaintiff-outcomes/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/science-of-justice-6578676/from-gut-feel-to-juror-science-how-data-quality-decides-plaintiff-outcomes.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Send us Fan Mail We argue that pretrial research only works when the data is venue-specific, scientifically vetted, and integrated end-to-end. We show how bad samples lead to undervaluing or overestimating cases, and how psychometrics, experimental design, and hyperlocal platforms sharpen strategy and jury selection. • stakes of pretrial data quality for plaintiffs • two core risks of flawed research undervaluing and overconfidence • seven common mistakes in focus groups and simulations • ve...