Episode
Science For Sale (In Defense of Climate Change - Episode 6)
- Podcast
- Science From the Fringe
- Published
- Jul 25, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2462
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/science-from-the-fringe-7022876/episodes/science-for-sale-in-defense-of-climate-change-episode-6/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/science-from-the-fringe-7022876/science-for-sale-in-defense-of-climate-change-episode-6.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In the sixth episode of In Defense of Climate Change , Bryce Nickels and climate policy scholar Roger Pielke Jr. discuss Roger’s recent essay examining the legacy of the influential 2004 Science paper introducing the concept of “stabilization wedges.” Roger’s essay was prompted by a recent ProPublica investigation revealing that this paper was heavily shaped by BP executives whose contributions were not acknowledged in the paper. Roger explains how the stabilization wedges paper became one of the most influential papers in the history of climate policy by promoting the idea that existing technologies were sufficient to address climate change. The paper became a powerful advocacy tool, shaping philanthropic investments, climate policy, and public discourse while contributing to efforts to marginalize scientists who argued that significant technological innovation would still be required. The conversation then turns to broader questions about the relationship between science, politics, and advocacy. Bryce and Roger discuss the distinction between conducting science and using scientific publications to market predetermined policy agendas, arguing that the latter can undermine both scientific integrity and public trust. Roger and Bryce also discuss the striking parallels between the stabilization wedges paper and the 2020 Nature Medicine paper, The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 . They discuss how both papers were used to influence public debate, the importance of transparency in scientific authorship, and the responsibility of scientific journals to investigate allegations of ghostwriting and misconduct in order to preserve confidence in the scientific record. (recorded July 24, 2026) Get full access to Science From the Fringe at sciencefromthefringe.substack.com/subscribe