Episode

Civil Disobedience III | Crises of the Republic

Podcast
Reading Hannah Arendt with Roger Berkowitz
Published
Feb 27, 2026
Duration seconds
3851
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://hac.podbean.com/e/civil-disobedience-iii-crises-of-the-republic/
Audio
https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/kjnwfm8949i22fui/2026_Crises_CivDis_III_V1.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/reading-hannah-arendt-with-roger-berkowitz-1160305/episodes/civil-disobedience-iii-crises-of-the-republic
Markdown
/podcast/reading-hannah-arendt-with-roger-berkowitz-1160305/civil-disobedience-iii-crises-of-the-republic.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/reading-hannah-arendt-with-roger-berkowitz-1160305/episodes/civil-disobedience-iii-crises-of-the-republic/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/reading-hannah-arendt-with-roger-berkowitz-1160305/civil-disobedience-iii-crises-of-the-republic.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

We continue our reading of Hannah Arendt’s essay “Civil Disobedience” from Crises of the Republic. Host Roger Berkowitz frames it through Mary McCarthy’s critique that civil disobedience is fundamentally conscientious, citing Socrates, Thoreau, and Gandhi. Berkowitz explains Arendt’s radical distinction between conscience (singular, inner dialogue) and politics (plural, public), arguing that grounding politics in morality risks tyranny and civil war, and that justice for Arendt is primarily the preservation of liberty for minorities against majorities. He outlines Arendt’s claim that the American “spirit of the laws” is consent understood horizontally as mutual promise, from which collective dissent follows, making civil disobedience coherent with American constitutionalism and a safeguard amid accelerating change. Arendt critiques ideological movements, links consent to voluntary association, and proposes civil disobedience as an institutional check when courts abdicate via the political questions doctrine, even calling for a constitutional amendment. "Consent implies dissent and not individual dissent, but collective dissent." Rate and review if you like this podcast! ABOUT: Produced by the Hannah Arendt Center at Bard College, this podcast offers close readings of Arendt's books alongside engaging interviews and thought-provoking conversations. Released weekly, each episode provides listeners with a deeper understanding of Arendt's philosophy and its relevance to contemporary issues. Available on all major podcast platforms, listeners join us on a captivating intellectual journey through the mind of Hannah Arendt. New episodes every Friday morning! Join Roger Berkowitz, Founder and Academic Director of the Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities at Bard Col…