Episode

The “Authentic Flavors, Real Fruit” Edition

Podcast
Rational Security
Published
Mar 26, 2026
Duration seconds
4030
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://shows.acast.com/rational-security/episodes/the-authentic-flavors-real-fruit-edition
Audio
https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/60427f9d34b9a27f4b6e3a8d/e/69c55040f4bf09c599867215/media.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/rational-security-525411/episodes/the-authentic-flavors-real-fruit-edition
Markdown
/podcast/rational-security-525411/the-authentic-flavors-real-fruit-edition.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/rational-security-525411/episodes/the-authentic-flavors-real-fruit-edition/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/rational-security-525411/the-authentic-flavors-real-fruit-edition.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

This week, Scott sat down with his Lawfare colleagues Molly Roberts, Tyler McBrien, and Renée DiResta to talk through the week’s big national security news stories, including: “The Meta-verse of Madness.” On Tuesday, a New Mexico jury reached a $375 million verdict against Meta after a seven-week trial that focused on whether the social media company knowingly harmed children’s mental health and facilitated child sexual exploitation through its algorithms. And just before recording, another verdict came down in a jury trial in California about whether Facebook and YouTube are too addictive in a way that harms an individual plaintiff in that case. Several other similar civil cases are set to go to trial in the coming months. What do we make of these verdicts, and do they signal a turning tide against social media companies for the algorithms that make them both profitable and (potentially) addictive? “SAVE-ing Face.” President Trump and Republican congressional leaders went back and forth this week over a deal that would put forward a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security, or at least less controversial parts of it, despite Trump’s threats not to sign any pieces of legislation until Congress passes his SAVE America Act. Trump views the SAVE America Act as vindication for his criticisms of the 2020 Election, but Republicans in the Senate have hedged and resisted his calls to blow up the filibuster in order to pass it. Instead, they now appear to have a deal in place that will allow less controversial parts of the funding for DHS to go forward—and for the funding for the most controversial parts, particularly ICE and removal operations, to go forward through reconciliation on what is likely to be a party line vote, along with select chunks of that SAVE America…