Episode
Blame, "Both Sides-ing," and Whataboutism: When Are These Appropriate? | Politics with Paul #84
- Podcast
- Politics with Paul
- Published
- Mar 17, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 3662
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://podcast.paulrader.org/episodes/EQaFh5VGRRv
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/politics-with-paul-7031218/episodes/blame-both-sides-ing-and-whataboutism-when-are-these-appropriate-politics-with-paul-84/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/politics-with-paul-7031218/blame-both-sides-ing-and-whataboutism-when-are-these-appropriate-politics-with-paul-84.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In political discussions, blame often gets thrown around. People get accused of "both sides-ing" an issue when they don't take a strong stance. Or accusations of wrongdoing are responded to with, "Yeah, but what about you?!" The vast majority of disputes in politics involve at least one of these rhetorical devices. Oftentimes, these tactics are destructive and unhelpful, making discourse worse. But are there times where blaming, accusing someone of "both sides-ing," or whataboutism are justified? Today's episode explores our penchant for engaging in these tactics, why they regularly happen, why the line for when these are acceptable is hard to draw, and what we should ask ourselves before we use these tactics. Quality discussions, and finding solutions to our most pressing problems, greatly depend on properly addressing these things.