Episode

What We Lose When We Bet on War

Podcast
Offline with Jon Favreau
Published
Mar 23, 2026
Duration seconds
2622
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://audioboom.com/posts/8877722
Audio
https://clrtpod.com/m/pscrb.fm/rss/p/prfx.byspotify.com/e/arttrk.com/p/CRMDA/mgln.ai/e/284/dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/audioboom.com/posts/8877722.mp3?modified=1774303305&sid=5166623&source=rss
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/offline-with-jon-favreau-5049631/episodes/what-we-lose-when-we-bet-on-war
Markdown
/podcast/offline-with-jon-favreau-5049631/what-we-lose-when-we-bet-on-war.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/offline-with-jon-favreau-5049631/episodes/what-we-lose-when-we-bet-on-war/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/offline-with-jon-favreau-5049631/what-we-lose-when-we-bet-on-war.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Life or death decisions are being gamified for profit on online prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket. But these platforms may also have the potential to create a modernized—if morally questionable—method of opinion polling. Politico Magazine contributing writer Nancy Scola joins Offline to explain the rise of these markets, the argument for them, and the people in D.C. who stand to gain the most. But first! Senator Chris Murphy stops by the show to break down the brand new BETS OFF Act, which bans wagering on government actions, terrorism, war, assassination, and events where an individual knows or controls the outcome. He and Jon discuss the bill's prospects for passing, and discuss what happens to us spiritually when every moral question becomes a market.