Episode
Episode 126: Notwithstanding clause on trial. Plus, why YOU may need a No Trespassing sign.
- Podcast
- Not Reserving Judgment
- Published
- Mar 26, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2524
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://podcast.show/2614722/episode/153765185/
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/not-reserving-judgment-6570186/episodes/episode-126-notwithstanding-clause-on-trial-plus-why-you-may-need-a-no-trespassing-sign/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/not-reserving-judgment-6570186/episode-126-notwithstanding-clause-on-trial-plus-why-you-may-need-a-no-trespassing-sign.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In Episode 126, we explain what happened this week at the Supreme Court in the notwithstanding clause case, we explain why the R v Singer decision means you should consider putting up a No Trespassing sign. Plus, our Bad Legal Takes of the Week. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: How a ban on religious symbols has triggered a Canadian constitutional debate (BBC) R. v. Singer, 2026 SCC 8 (Supreme Court of Canada) Was Upset By Facebook Post (Blacklock's Reporter) Judge cuts down scope of Calgary bubble zone bylaw; CCF calls on city to fully repeal (TheCCF.ca) Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn. The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.