Episode
Episode 124: Subsidized Childcare for Refugee CLAIMANTS? Plus, the chances & effects of Alberta separation.
- Podcast
- Not Reserving Judgment
- Published
- Mar 11, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2250
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://podcast.show/2614722/episode/152887225/
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/not-reserving-judgment-6570186/episodes/episode-124-subsidized-childcare-for-refugee-claimants-plus-the-chances-effects-of-alberta-separation/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/not-reserving-judgment-6570186/episode-124-subsidized-childcare-for-refugee-claimants-plus-the-chances-effects-of-alberta-separation.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In Episode 124, we explore both the practical and theoretical constitutional consequences of Alberta separation, however unlikely, and particularly for Indigenous groups in that province. Christine explains the recent Kanyinda decision from the Supreme Court of Canada (Quebec (Attorney General) v. Kanyinda, 2026 SCC 7) and it looks like, once again, we have more "bubble zones" to fight. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Protecting access to places of worship, schools (BC Gov News) Marc Miller says Musqueam deal has ‘nothing to do with’ private property (Toronto Star) Quebec (Attorney General) v. Kanyinda, 2026 SCC 7 (Supreme Court Judgments) Indigenous Chiefs gather at legislature, pressure Alberta to quash separatism pus h (Global News) Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn. The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.