Episode
Episode 118: Inside the 'right to bike lanes' appeal. Plus, should we ban kids from social media?
- Podcast
- Not Reserving Judgment
- Published
- Jan 29, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2190
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://podcast.show/2614722/episode/151842724/
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/not-reserving-judgment-6570186/episodes/episode-118-inside-the-right-to-bike-lanes-appeal-plus-should-we-ban-kids-from-social-media/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/not-reserving-judgment-6570186/episode-118-inside-the-right-to-bike-lanes-appeal-plus-should-we-ban-kids-from-social-media.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In Episode 118, we give you a full recap of Ontario's appeal of a decision that found a law designed to remove bike lanes from Toronto violated the rights to life and security of the person. Plus, we discuss whether government should ban social media for kids under age 14. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode: Toronto cyclists defend bike lane challenge before Ontario's top court (CBC News) Federal officials draft plans to ban social media for children under 14 (Globe and Mail) B.C. woman files lawsuit, claims seizing pets under veterinary care violates Charter rights (CBC News) Cycle Toronto et al. v. Attorney General of Ontario et al. , 2025 ONSC 1650 (CanLii) Joanna Baron: The Liberal’s approach to regulating the internet is a disaster. What comes next could be even worse (The Hub) Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn. The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.