Episode

Blade includes vs components: how we decide

Podcast
No Compromises
Published
Aug 16, 2025
Duration seconds
955
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://share.transistor.fm/s/e1200f77
Audio
https://media.transistor.fm/e1200f77/7ce8d839.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/no-compromises-1309932/episodes/blade-includes-vs-components-how-we-decide
Markdown
/podcast/no-compromises-1309932/blade-includes-vs-components-how-we-decide.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/no-compromises-1309932/episodes/blade-includes-vs-components-how-we-decide/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/no-compromises-1309932/blade-includes-vs-components-how-we-decide.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Blade gives you two big levers for keeping views maintainable: @include and Blade components. When should you use one versus the other? Does it matter? In the latest episode of the No Compromises podcast, we lay out a clear heuristic for when to extract markup for organization (includes) versus when to encapsulate and reuse with controlled scope (components). We also touch on scope pitfalls, “passing for documentation,” and why performance worries usually lie elsewhere. Sign up for the free Mastering Laravel newsletter . The highest value-to-time ratio you will find.