Episode

Are Polygraph Tests Really Useful In True Crime?!

Podcast
Mysteries and Histories
Published
Jun 26, 2026
Duration seconds
1959
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/georgiamariexo/episodes/Are-Polygraph-Tests-Really-Useful-In-True-Crime-e3l7er6
Audio
https://traffic.megaphone.fm/APO6255759713.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/mysteries-and-histories-1576928/episodes/are-polygraph-tests-really-useful-in-true-crime
Markdown
/podcast/mysteries-and-histories-1576928/are-polygraph-tests-really-useful-in-true-crime.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/mysteries-and-histories-1576928/episodes/are-polygraph-tests-really-useful-in-true-crime/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/mysteries-and-histories-1576928/are-polygraph-tests-really-useful-in-true-crime.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Polygraph tests or “lie detectors” sound like the perfect true crime shortcut: strap someone in, ask the right questions, watch the needles jump, and let the machine tell you who’s lying. In reality, they sit in a murky space between science and theatre. They don’t measure lies, they measure stress, heart rate, blood pressure, breathing, sweat, and then a human interpreter decides what those spikes mean, which makes them dangerously persuasive in interrogation rooms and almost useless in courtrooms. In case after case, people have “passed” while hiding horrific secrets, and others have “failed” simply because they were terrified, traumatized, or anxious, not because they were guilty. That’s why most judges won’t allow polygraph results as hard evidence, and why investigators who lean on them too heavily can end up chasing the wrong suspect or pressuring someone into a confession just to make a bad result go away.