Episode
SB1047
- Podcast
- muckrAIkers
- Published
- Sep 30, 2024
- Duration seconds
- 4760
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://kairos.fm/muckraikers/e002
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/muckraikers-7026051/episodes/sb1047/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/muckraikers-7026051/sb1047.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Why is Mark Ruffalo talking about SB1047, and what is it anyway? Tune in for our thoughts on the now vetoed California legislation that had Big Tech scared. (00:00) - Intro (00:31) - Updates from a relatively slow week (03:32) - Disclaimer: SB1047 vetoed during recording (still worth a listen) (05:24) - What is SB1047 (12:30) - Definitions (17:18) - Understanding the bill (28:42) - What are the players saying about it? (46:44) - Addressing critiques (55:59) - Open Source (01:02:36) - Takeaways (01:15:40) - Clarification on impact to big tech (01:18:51) - Outro Links SB1047 legislation page SB1047 CalMatters page Newsom vetoes SB1047 CAIS newsletter on SB1047 Prominent AI nerd letter Anthropic's letter SB1047 ~explainer Additional SB1047 Related Coverage Opposition to SB1047 'makes no sense' Newsom on SB1047 Andreesen Horowitz on SB1047 Classy move by Dan Ex-OpenAI employee says Altman doesn't want regulation Other Sources o1 doesn't measure up in new benchmark paper OpenAI losses and gains OpenAI crypto hack "Murati out" -Mira Murati, probably Altman pitching datacenters to White House Sam Altman, 'podcast bro' Paper: Contract Design with Safety Inspections