Episode

24. Jens Eisert on joining ML4Q, frontiers in quantum information and teaching

Podcast
ML4Q&A - from the lives of quantum physicists
Published
Sep 8, 2025
Duration seconds
5939
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://ml4qna.podigee.io/24-24-jens-eisert
Audio
https://audio.podigee-cdn.net/2091882-m-e86573c72740c163438bded9614ada82.mp3?source=feed
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/ml4q-a-from-the-lives-of-quantum-physicists-5212739/episodes/24-jens-eisert-on-joining-ml4q-frontiers-in-quantum-information-and-teaching
Markdown
/podcast/ml4q-a-from-the-lives-of-quantum-physicists-5212739/24-jens-eisert-on-joining-ml4q-frontiers-in-quantum-information-and-teaching.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/ml4q-a-from-the-lives-of-quantum-physicists-5212739/episodes/24-jens-eisert-on-joining-ml4q-frontiers-in-quantum-information-and-teaching/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/ml4q-a-from-the-lives-of-quantum-physicists-5212739/24-jens-eisert-on-joining-ml4q-frontiers-in-quantum-information-and-teaching.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Jens Eisert joins ML4Q as a member for the next funding period which was granted around the time Chris and Mira recorded this Episode with him. So naturally, they discuss the German Excellence Initiative and how joining ML4Q was a natural step for Jens, given he has many previous and ongoing collaborations with other ML4Q members. Jens shares his insights on various aspects of quantum information processing such as benchmarking and no-go theorems, his recent white paper on AI and quantum computing, quantum error correction, complexity and pseudo chaos. Ultimately Jens makes a convincing case that quantum computers remain fascinating "even if you confine yourself to saying things that are true". He reflects on the unwritten rules of academia, teaching and inspiring students, and his approach to finding research topics by looking for "cultural gaps" between fields.