Episode

Does Meghan Markle deserve the media pile-on?

Podcast
Media Tarts
Published
Apr 24, 2026
Duration seconds
1838
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://rss.com/podcasts/media-tarts/2763189
Audio
https://content.rss.com/episodes/381235/2763189/media-tarts/2026_04_24_02_39_39_367948de-f147-4b9f-8d81-8290a0b4ab30.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/media-tarts-7807734/episodes/does-meghan-markle-deserve-the-media-pile-on
Markdown
/podcast/media-tarts-7807734/does-meghan-markle-deserve-the-media-pile-on.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/media-tarts-7807734/episodes/does-meghan-markle-deserve-the-media-pile-on/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/media-tarts-7807734/does-meghan-markle-deserve-the-media-pile-on.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

About the Guest(s): Amanda Goff is a prominent columnist and author known for her fierce and direct writing style. She writes for the Daily Mail and has released three memoirs detailing her diverse experiences in the adult industry. Episode Summary: In this lively episode of Media Tarts, hosts Wade Kingsley and Natasha Lee, along with guest Amanda Goff, dive into the highly-discussed media coverage of Meghan Markle's recent visit to Australia. The trio explores the sharp criticism Meghan has faced and whether the coverage has crossed into a territory of unwarranted nastiness. Throughout the episode, the conversation progresses to dissect the societal fascination and disdain targeted at Meghan Markle, reflecting on whether her actions warrant the intensity of the media's scrutiny. In an engaging discussion, Wade, Natasha, and Amanda unpack layers of gender critique, public accountability, and media responsibilities, analysing whether female critics approach Meghan more harshly due to heightened perceptivity of her actions. Another focal point is the intricate dynamics of a polarised public where opinions shift and clash starkly, such as in Meghan's case. Key Takeaways: The media often reflects public sentiment, but it's crucial to differentiate between criticism and undue harshness, especially in media coverage of public figures like Meghan Markle. Criticism towards Meghan Markle stems not only from her public actions but also from the perception of disingenuousness and hypocrisy. Journalists must balance their responsibilities in reporting honestly while not fuelling unwarranted media pile-ons. Media coverage may at times lean towards a personal bias, especially when gender dynamics are involved, highlighting a differential treatment in media narratives. There's a stro…